I gave a paper on how we think about #Lourdes &, given a new discovery from the archives there, how we engage in narratives about #religious experience & today @RegisCollege, @TorSchTheology, @UofT & you can listen to it here on #SoundCloud if you’d like: https://t.co/GTeePpasLd
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 30, 2020
What stands as proof when examining hagiographical accounts of apparitions and objects of popular piety? What justifies belief in religious narratives? Michael Rogers, SJ, is examining these topics and more during our latest #RegisTalks pic.twitter.com/lwGv9L0PCQ
— Regis College (@RegisCollege) January 30, 2020
When @antoniospadaro rickrolls the entire #Catholic church waiting for a post-synodal exhortation.... Well done my friend... 🤣🤣 https://t.co/RYsCniXH6c
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 29, 2020
#CatholicTwitter When #PopeFrancis is about to drop his exhortation on the #amazonsynod... (ps please read it before you comment on it, and don’t just flip to THAT section.) pic.twitter.com/zbPhYz4LZs
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 29, 2020
👀 👀 👀 https://t.co/Z7n5Q9K1bz
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 29, 2020
I’m on the way to publishing it as a paper, but perhaps I’ll find a way to put the talk online as well!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 28, 2020
I’ll see what I can do!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 28, 2020
I’ll see what I can do!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 28, 2020
I did some archival research in Lourdes this summer and found some documents that should make us rethink the way that we think about an important part of the #Lourdes narrative. If you’re in Toronto, come listen! https://t.co/tuydQA91yf
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 28, 2020
I’ll take a look!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 27, 2020
Only if you offer properly theological reasons why the review was faulty defensible in front of a committee of Radner, Mangina, and Goulding. 😉
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 27, 2020
My new side project in #toronto. Reviewing places where one can both drink coffee AND study. Give me a follow on that account if you’re into that thing. Occasional coffee/theology based puns to follow. 🤦🏻♂️ https://t.co/DPSvr4AnAk
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 27, 2020
Congrats D! Well deserved!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 24, 2020
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. https://t.co/2g76bSUdcP
— Austen Ivereigh (@austeni) January 24, 2020
Sorry ines!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 24, 2020
I wonder what those who say that Our Lady of #Guadalupe wouldn’t break the law by helping #migrants at the US border would say to the reports that Our Lady of #Medjugorje moved her #apparitions around to defy local laws.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 23, 2020
Hot Take: Unanimous first ballot hall of fame selections in all sports are a special honor for the undisputed greatest of all time at their position. Mariano Rivera is a case in point, #Jeter is definitely first ballot #HallofFame, but not the best shortstop ever. pic.twitter.com/7PZUbRtcAD
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 22, 2020
DO NOT. LET YOUR TEENAGER. WEAR A MAGA HAT. TO THE MARCH. FOR LIFE.
— Steve the (@SteveMissionary) January 21, 2020
Call them POEFs (People of the Extraordinary Form) seems like a good, descriptive, title which is neither judgmental nor value laden for either group. 3/3 pic.twitter.com/g9jbkZeHJf
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
I’m absolutely in favor of people being able to attend the extraordinary form from before the liturgical reforms of Paul VI if that’s how God speaks to them, but perhaps rather than calling them “#radtrads” or “traditionalists,” which they’re technically not, 2/3
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
What if, and hear me out on this, we decided not to cede the title “#traditional” to the extraordinary form of the #Catholic #mass? Since “tradition” implies development by its very nature, are those who go to the post #VaticanII masses ACTUALLY the traditionalists? 1/3 pic.twitter.com/SAn14OFpXg
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
Send in an abstract theology friends! Toronto is lovely in May, and it’s a whole weekend of conference (the faculty conference follows it) on an interesting topic! https://t.co/DS7gS524c9
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
Dear @TheBeerStoreON and friends in #Ontario please punctuate this message on the trucks: “Champions of #beer love every day.” I’ll await your response to this infuriating conundrum. pic.twitter.com/n3G6pehhaN
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
Don’t look at me, I’m just a grade school dropout in a theology PhD program. 🤣
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 21, 2020
Didn’t make the argument, you seem to have wrongly inferred it. If that’s on your conscience, or that of other adherents of the extraordinary form, I leave that to you and your confessor to sort.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 20, 2020
I didn’t compare them, just asked a question of why they would choose that spot. You made the comparison.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 20, 2020
Not sure why I’d cry, and I am informed of Munich locations. There are many much more Catholic places in Munich (the tomb of Bl. Rupert Meyer, the Cathedral, etc.)
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 20, 2020
Also, why would they choose the particular spot where Hitler had one of his most infamous monuments to the beer hall putsch? So many other better places to do that in Munich if they were going to do it in the first place.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 20, 2020
In case you need to read this.
— Samantha Yanity (@SamanthaYanity) January 18, 2020
If you’re a Catholic and can’t afford a pilgrimage...
Or a Catholic conference...
Or a fancy lent journal...
Or went to public school...
Or don’t have a lot of followers...
You’re still Catholic. You’re worthy. You’re loved. God loves every bit.
💜💜💜 pic.twitter.com/YpJJkrNMtM
— Holy Cross WBB (@HCrossWBB) January 18, 2020
Dawn has put up, and she’s done the work. It’s on you to put up or shut up.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
I’m glad you can do it all day. Some of us have lives to live though. Look at her list, or maybe just write an article clarifying that you oppose any form of antisemitism as being opposed to our faith. Oremus pro invicem, all the best.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
Dawn has produced a lengthy list, most of which seems to condemn you by your own words and from your own writing. If you find antisemitism as abhorrent as you say you do, then you’ll give that list a thoughtful look and then write something else to clarify. I hope you do!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
When it’s something as abhorrent as Antisemitism I think it’s on you to put up or shut up. She’s produced a pretty clear list of both your written work and your interpersonal interactions that could be taken as Antisemitic. You just need to go to that list and clarify.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
Not Calumny when it’s well documented. pic.twitter.com/s0mVGTO4Uk
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
And again, the charges weren’t mine, but I do think you have to answer for them and certainly not with foul or obscene language if you proport to be an expert on things Catholic.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
You really don’t take on all comers though, since you block people. Are you saying that you didn’t use the Yiddish word for penis in reference to her? She seems to have that documented. Your language calling me an “ass” and a “clown” seems to indicate who the unstable one is.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
extra ecclesiam, nulla salus
— Massimo Faggioli (@MassimoFaggioli) January 17, 2020
extra social media, sola salus
Now was that so hard? Glad we agree on that point. Even better if you’d look at Dawns post and clarify for us all what she documents there. have a good night. Oremus pro invicem.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
And still, you persist in not renouncing antisemitism.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
With that, I am going to bed, I’ll be praying for you.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
It’s a long list which I said you should respond to. If you don’t want to be associated with it though, just take one simple step here and denounce antisemitism in this exchange. You still haven’t done that, I hope that’s not telling.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
Nope, I said you have to answer these accusations. I also made clear, as you should, that Antisemitism is antithetical to Catholic Faith. That part isn’t hard, still you seem reluctant.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
The things that are anti-Semitic have been named there, you’re capable of clicking & reading. If true, then you owe @DawnofMercy a profound apology at the very least &, given your claims to be a Catholic thinker, you need to make clear that that behavior is contrary to the faith.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
If you can refute it great, but all the better if you make a clear rejection of antisemitism as being patently contrary to our faith.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
Look at the quoted tweet. There’s a pretty long list and, having read your dreadful article, I’m guessing it’s all well and easily documented.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
So can you say, in good conscience, that you did not use the language you’re accused of using and that @DawnofMercy cannot produce a record of these interactions? The article you posted seems to just be you wanting to justify such disposable behavior.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
.@austinruse must answer these accusations or admit that he opposes the teaching of St John Paul II, his successors & post-bellum predecessors and is in active opposition to the teachings of the Holy #Catholic #Church. Make no mistakes, friends, #Antisemitism is not #Catholicism. https://t.co/K8MiLNv8XV
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 17, 2020
Did the Red Sox do something wrong?
— Gabrielle (@gfstarr1) January 16, 2020
Yes.
Are they the only ones?
No.
Was the story framed to single them out?
Clearly.
Should they be held accountable?
Absolutely, and so should any
other team that did the SAME
EXACT THING.
One almost wonders if making a poor argument emphatically for clerical #celibacy as a #theological doctrine, rather than #ecclesial discipline, if indeed that is what Cardinal Sarah does, could actually end up undermining the discipline itself. It’ll be an interesting read.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 16, 2020
Please join me in prayer for all of the members of @HCrossWRowing and the entire @GoHolyCross community.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
Im in agreement on Corpus Christi in particular. I’d love to see more parishes, and not just the rad trad ones, have processions on that day with the appropriate feast after, and ideally one that feeds the poor too. Could be a great witness.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
A solid list. What about each one? How do you feast? (Also, I’m surprised that a certain Marian feast in February isn’t up there)
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
It’s from the Italian version of the onion
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
I love fireworks during the mass in Latin America... especially when someone goes outside and lights one off at the moment of the consecration.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
That story is from the Italian Version of the Onion..
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
“A “Saints day” also has an anthropological significance: it is a feast day.” Ok #CatholicTwitter hive mind... give me favorite saints celebration (mass, party, parade, festival, food) and why. Go! pic.twitter.com/ULtnXsZpsb
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 15, 2020
Dear #CatholicTwitter, here’s your daily reminder that that thing that you’re freaking out about today doesn’t mean much to the majority of #Catholics in the pews each Sunday. (And in this case, it won’t mean much after the Post-Synodal Exhortation drops) pic.twitter.com/YzgM3cqfGe
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 14, 2020
FWIW, moments like this in the #Catholic #Church are exactly why we have a #Pope. In the end we can all opine about #theological points, from the lowliest denizen of #CatholicTwitter up to #BenedictXVI, but the buck stops with #PopeFrancis. pic.twitter.com/ANHuzw0eod
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 14, 2020
Deft analysis from @CharlesinRome on Benedict XVI and the celibacy debate: Benedict is defending celibacy from the media, not from Francis. https://t.co/sp4FbPUb8A
— Crux (@Crux) January 13, 2020
Yeah but that fake Boston Accent. 😱
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 13, 2020
... as long as they ultimately sumbit themselves to the authority of whatever #PopeFrancis decides, which they will. I’m not too worried about there being disagreement between people of good faith. 2/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 12, 2020
#Benedict XVI wrote as a private #theologian even during his #papacy. If he and #Cardinal Sarah, writing as private theologians, want to take a stance against what the #AmazonSynod supported, that’s fine. No scandal there... 1/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 12, 2020
Half of #CatholicTwitter appears to have no sense of humor. It’s really depressing.
— Michael S. Miller (@MSMillerNYC) January 9, 2020
That moment when, as a researcher of religious devotion, one that you had sort of dismissed as too out in left field l, even for you, keeps popping up in your reading, and even on subway ads in Toronto. pic.twitter.com/4U5XVZApRq
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 9, 2020
Hahaha. I have a hygienist here in Toronto that I have nicknamed “the spear” for that reason... my dentist is aware of this nickname, and still “the spear” persists.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 7, 2020
They’re not wrong about D....
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
I will! I do often, and I’d suggest it’s good for every soul, yours included, especially when participating in the use of racist signs and symbols.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
I’m praying for you.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
Needlessly persisting in using a racist meme is wrong, as is euthanasia, as is organ harvesting. I’m not sure what you’re after here.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
Yet another reason.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
I’ve simply pointed out that the frog meme currently has racist significance. If you’re not comfortable with being associated with that, remove the frog from your handle. That’s all on you though.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 6, 2020
Just used your definition there Steve. Anyhow, off to do better things. Prayers for you!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
By his own words, he wants the pope to resign in shame because he has a difference of option with him (though Steve wrongly claims that to be an object of knowledge) I’m just agreeing with him on cancel culture, and pointing out the inconsistency of his participation in it.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Root of how you qualify yourself as being outside of cancel culture. My claim is that you do participate in it, and, on your own terms, make Twitter toxic, because your claims are mere opinion and don’t rise to the level of knowledge.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Since, by your own admission, you’re not capable of understanding how you’ve lost the argument, it’s not worth debating it here. I think a thorough reading of the Meno might help you understand how you seem confusing knowledge and opinion though, since that seems to be the 1/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
If, by your own admission, you’re not capable of understanding how you’ve lost the argument, it’s not worth debating it here. I think a thorough reading of the Meno might help you understand how you seem confusing knowledge and opinion though.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Ah yes, insult and insinuation, the last refuge for one who has lost an argument.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
I’m not changing it Steve, I’m pointing out the incoherence of your supposed argument.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Which makes this cancel culture. 2/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Again, per a usual, your distinctions are unhelpful and intellectually dishonest, especially because you really haven’t ever named an objective criterion by which Francis should be considered the worst. Your claims don’t rise to the level of knowledge, they are mere opinion. 1/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
So you would like to see him “cancelled” as soon as possible then? Sorry Steve, you can’t call for an end to cancel culture and be one of its chief advocates in the Church. We’re going around in circles here because you’re not being honest with yourself.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Right, but I didn’t judge you, just pointed out that you’ve got a racist meme in your handle (you might want to change that) and that racism is a sin. Your own conscience is bothering you there, it seems, my friend. I’ll pray for you.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Well, you’ve sadly fallen into the sin of presumption and slander. I’m not at all a liberal, and I am very much pro-life. I’ve even marched in DC a few times. Also, it’s “you’re” not your.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Not sure where I endorsed grave sin, but thanks.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
I merely pointed out that the use of the Frog Meme has taken on racist meanings in our culture & that racism is a sin. Also, here I’m pointing out that if republicans want to be taken seriously, they should be better about optics. Thanks for your attempts at fraternal correction.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
So , by your own logic, you guys don’t want the pope fired or deplatformed. Well that’s good to know, but it sounds wildly inconsistent with everything else you’ve said.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
I have Iranian friends who are people of goodwill. So... peace to them, and the many others who are. #noenemies
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
On this #Epiphany Sunday, how seriously do we as #catholics take “peace to people of goodwill,” when we pray the Gloria, particularly when it applies to people of other races and Creeds? Especially in the face of #war with #iran?
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Sorry. I don’t engage with people who make use of racist memes (like the Pepe the frog) in their Twitter handle other than to point out, in charity, that racism is a grave sin. (Regardless of which form of the Mass you attend)
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
We’re on to baseball.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
Let’s Go Red Sox.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
When you sit down to watch the #patriots in the #NFLWildCard after they lost to the Dolphins last weekend. pic.twitter.com/BKO4YrQkzm
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 5, 2020
It’s in the calling someone a tiger and implying (wrongly) that the other is a zoo keeper
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
Sure Steve. Sure. Once you made that silly claim about Francis being the worst pope ever you showed a complete intellectual irresponsibility and ignorance of history... but the Pope is in error, and you’re the judge of that. Sounds awfully Protestant to me. Give my best to Luther pic.twitter.com/3GqPZoAJjK
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
Nope. He implied my position was untenable simply because I’m a Jesuit rather than arguing for his presence on Twitter. Classic ad hominem. Sorry, you’re wrong on this front.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
Tom Brady’s playoff hype video will have you ready to run through a brick wall.
— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) January 4, 2020
It’s too late to be scared. pic.twitter.com/Ebd7G5Ixfb
Worse than Alexander VI or Julius II? What about Pius IX, who lost the Papal States and lopped off a lot of heads? What about the popes who let Maciel in? Come on Steve. You claim to know better, stop making crazy claims.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
You are one of the chief proponents of a cancel culture against no less than the vicar of Christ and successor of Peter. Come on Steve, you’re more Tertullian than Augustine, and you don’t even have the courage to admit it.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
Fair enough, but I suspect it’s more Kierkegaard than Strauss, more the existential knight of faith than a subtle hermeneutical approach. The point’s well taken though. 👍🏻
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
Also, how is “duking it out,” adding to the civility of twitter. Your true colors are showing Steve. One inconsistency in argumentation after another...
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 4, 2020
If you’re truly ignorant of it, & are genuine in your first tweet, you should take a look back at some of our past exchange. The insults & innuendo from your followers following on some of your instances of “sharing” are certainly lacking in charity, and your tone encourages it.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
There’s a difference between disagreement and harassment, and many of your followers engage in that behavior. I’m not making a blanket claim about everyone, but if you’re instigating such behavior Steve, you are in part responsible for the lack of civility on #catholictwitter.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
I’ve never called down an army of trolls on you Steve. That’s your usual response. My sarcasm towards you and the rest has only come after that move, when there’s really no possible fruitful response. Praying for you that you find a real answer to your question.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
You all likely need a Twitter retreat.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
Let me be clearer though, it’s the dynamic that you create here. Rather than engaging in constructive dialogue you have often in the past, to myself & others, merely called out a cadre of trolls to harass people. Hence my response. If you want to make Catholic twitter better 1/2
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
You, and your whole crew, are actively proving my point Steve.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
And, with your ad hominem attack, you have sadly proven my point.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
Maybe Malik is trying to point out precisely that people don’t get that the political end is merely instrumental for Jägerstätter, and he’s taking us along for that painful misunderstanding?
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
Umm y’all could stop using Twitter?
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
“No more war, #war never again. It is peace, #peace which must guide the destinies of peoples and of all mankind” Saint John Paul II #CatholicTwitter #NoWar #iran @realDonaldTrump
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
That’d be wonderful, thanks so much. There’s a section I’d like to tighten up in it either way, but I’ll definitely send it along and, since I’m at Regis, anything on Balthasar and Lonergan is a helpful read for me!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
I will pass greetings along, and I’d be honored if you’d give it a look once I see what she thinks!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
Waiting on the comments of the great Sr. Gill Goulding, then going to think about it. It’s either the worst or the best paper I’ve ever written. 🤣
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 3, 2020
Hahaha he read Moltmann and that seems to have been close enough for him. 🤣🤣
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 2, 2020
Oh absolutely. I just wrote on Ellacuria’s “Crucified people” and Balthasar’s concept of blood in Mysterium Paschale. His hesitations seem to be around Moltmann, though and that’s Sobrino’s dissertation.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 2, 2020
Also, he’s kind of a cranky old man in that interview.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 2, 2020
Well his point that we shouldn’t need a liberation theology is well taken though. He basically told Scola that ALL theology, done well, should be liberating. I agree though, some Gutierrez, particularly given his views on subjectivity, could’ve been fruitful for him.
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 2, 2020
Started the new year with mass at the Cathedral. I kind of love that Mary looks a little worried that she’s going to drop #Jesus in this statue... and baby Jesus is just excited to see you. https://t.co/S2mxP3G7Xo pic.twitter.com/TqZeY8zWn1
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) January 1, 2020
Happy New Year! All the best!
— Michael Rogers, SJ (@mrogerssj) December 31, 2019
